NorthPoint sues Verizon in California Superior Court [Case # 317249] for Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract
and Fraud
The FAT LADY THREW UP: US Trustee E. Lynn Schoenmann sells NorthPoint down the river and pockets a cool 5 1/4 million dollars for accepting a paultry $175 Mil to settle NorthPoint's lawsuit against Verizon. This settlement would pay 50 million to secured creditors leaving 20 cents on the dollar to unsecured creditors and bondholders. The companies shareholders get wiped out. The bondholders get just about wiped out. And the Dept of Justice US Trustee E. Lynn Schoenmann becomes a millionaire! 7/23/02. The sadest part of the whole story is that this E. Lynn Schoenmann Character promised all of the innocent INJURED NorthPoint Shareholders that she was going to pursue this $4 Billion dollar lawsuit against Verizon for Fraud to the fullest extent. Did Schoenmann do this by settling for $175 Million 3 business days before the long awaited trial? Did Schoenmann commit FRAUD AGAINST EVERYONE INVOLVED? Isn't this a disgrace to say the least and unprofessional horrific matter at hand that Schoenmann caused? Read on and you will see the disgraceful decision making that Schoenmann committed against NorthPoint Shareholders she promised to support!
Dear Sirs or Madam:
We would like to respectfully bring to your attention a pending lawsuit
for "FRAUD" and other critical charges and allegations that NorthPoint
Communications has brought against Verizon and its Executives.
NorthPoint Communication’s lawsuit against Verizon could easily result
in a jury award of $4+ billion or more. In a recent interview, E. Lynn
Schoenmann, NorthPoint’s Federal Trustee was quoted as saying It’s a very
good lawsuit. I’m taking this very seriously and we have a very strong
case.
Our NorthPoint Shareholder’s Group (recently obtained a copy of the
07/12/2001 Amended Complaint) concerning this case and it is now clear why
Ms. Schoenmann would make such confident statements. The allegations in
the Amended Complaint appear to be devastating to Verizon. I recommend
that you read the entire Complaint, but you could sneak a peek at
paragraph #10 on pages 4 & 5 and paragraph #48 on page 21 before you
start. You can view the Amended Complaint in another window
If you want to follow up on this matter, Ms. E. Lynn Schoenmann,
NorthPoint’s U.S. Trustee can be reached by phone at 415-362-0415, Fax at
415-362-0416 or Email at Schoenmann@psinet.com.
NorthPoint’s San Francisco law firm of Folger, Levin & Kahn has
assigned lawyers Doug Sullivan dsullivan@FLK.com and Samuel Miller
smiller@FLK.com to the case. Either attorney can be reached by phone at
415-986-2800.
Our Shareholder’s Group has a large amount of information concerning
this case, which can be found at our website. Many of us
are long term, 'Mom and Pops" investors and were seeking to invest with
hopes of providing our children and families with a more secure future for
i.e.. College Tuition and similar, only to find out that we were all lied
to by Verizon as well. Our investments were whisked away wrongfully by
Verizon for no legitimate reasons. If we can be of any help to you, please
contact us by replying to
this email. It is believed that we communicate with hundreds of NorthPoint Shareholder's some of whom are former NorthPoint Employees who
have horror stories, sadly to say, where in many cases their finances were
stolen due to Verizon's overt actions.
NorthPoint Communication's amended complaint and affirmation names Verizon Executives
who are alleged to have used Deceitful, Unfair Business practices as well
as "Fraud" and lies in order to attempt to confuse and distort the merger
agreement that was signed and agreed upon in full on 08/08/2000 by Verizon
and NorthPoint. In this amended complaint you will read allegations that a
Verizon Vice-President Steven Smith communicated with NorthPoint and its
Executives as well as his own Verizon Executives, clearly attempting to
manipulate NorthPoint into selling the entire NorthPoint Company for less
than what both companies agreed for Verizon to pay for 55% of NorthPoint
as per merger agreement 08/08/2000. Steven Smith supposedly put this in
writing along with other Verizon Executives such as Telecom Division
President Lawrence Babbio who was familiar with all these allegations
within the amended complaint, where Verizon Executives attempted what
appears to be "Black Mail" and "Fraud".
Isn't this corrupt in nature for a larger more powerful company to
attempt to "strong arm" a smaller competitor like NorthPoint, just prior
to the date when Verizon was obligated to make a $200 million payment to
NorthPoint? Verizon went back on their word and contractual obligations
and in turn attempted to steal NorthPoint for half the original cost and
written agreement
Please read the amended complaint for further, more accurate accounts of the
overt and blatant 'Fraud" that Verizon's Executives, "Smith, Babbio, and
Messrs" (but not limited to), have committed against NorthPoint.
NorthPoint's complaint will undoubtedly bring shame and dishonor to
Verizon and their Executives who have been charged with some serious
allegations such as "Fraud" and a variety of other disgraceful claims! If
this is confirmed as being true by way of a settlement or jury verdict is
this business or corruption? Verizon Executives apparently claimed that
they wanted NorthPoint for less money than what was 'Legally" agreed to.
Now after the fact, and mind you, all "tech stocks" across the board were
down and out, but yet Verizon had their minds dead set on committing the
inevitable, "Fraud" and "Breach of Contract" to name a few allegations and
at all costs necessary to "wrongfully terminate" the promised legal merger
with NorthPoint to improve as they did the stock price and forecast to
include stating so within press releases to the public. Ultimately,
Verizon would attempt as a last measure, because all else failed in trying
to persuade NorthPoint to change its legal merger agreement, Verizon
decided to attempt (as the lawsuit claims) to commit "Fraud" by lying and
fabricating an alleged "Material Adverse Event" clause to remove Verizon
from a legally binding merger resulting in NorthPoint going into
bankruptcy directly because of Verizon’s fabrications and deceitfully
unfair tactics. Please read our complaint below which includes additional
websites that have done thorough investigations and research concerning
Verizon and the Baby Bells and have concluded that "beyond any reasonable
doubt" that Verizon has intentionally, criminally, and wrongfully
committed terrible acts against many smaller competitive companies, their
shareholders, and creditors, customers belonging to them, employees
working for them and the entire world seeking Broadband DSL and similar
services.
I am a member of a
shareholder group which includes many shareholders that were former
NorthPoint Employees. Everyone was overtly hurt by Verizon’s cancellation
of a legally binding merger with NorthPoint Communications without "Just
Cause". The Merger would have been mutually beneficial to both companies,
its employees and the entire world seeking Broadband DSL.
It is our belief, as I am hopeful that you can appreciate, that a good
majority, approximately 45% of the 133 million outstanding shares are
owned by former NorthPoint employees who were unnecessarily damaged and
their families made to suffer by Verizon’s dirty deeds. Therefore, we are
sincerely and respectfully requesting your continued assistance and much
needed support concerning all the innocent victims and same being "Fairly
and Equitably" compensated due to Verizon’s unjustifiable ‘Wrongful
Termination" of a promised merger.
The Baby Bells (including Verizon) have unfairly treated the
Competitive Local Exchange Companies (CLEC) like NorthPoint which were or
are offering services which can be beneficial to the public and to the
companies that employ such people etc. Verizon seems to have committed
anti trust and monopolization violations that are considerably worse than
Microsoft is alleged to have committed. Please don’t allow Verizon to use
the system as a scapegoat or to have them pay off anyone or group to
assist them with avoiding having to answer for all the issues that are at
hand. Broadband DSL once offered by NorthPoint would have been beneficial
to Verizon and millions of potential customers. This would have, as many
experts report, assisted the overall Technology sector, allowing
innovation and new products as well as old to have benefited and improved
immensely.
It is believed by many honest impartial analysts, that eliminating
NorthPoint as Verizon has done so calculatedly and blatantly, has caused
not only as we have said, NorthPoint employees and their families,
NorthPoint shareholders and hundreds of companies which were NorthPoint
customers and suppliers, to be ruined and put in disarray. Also the public
and consumers has been affected extremely negatively. Case in point,
Verizon’s own DSL customers have a class action lawsuit against Verizon
for failing to provide and make good on the DSL services that they have
promised to provide the world. The President of Communication Workers of
America (CWA) even confirmed this by stating in a recent press report that
"Verizon DSL is Piss Poor". There have also been some articles stating
that Verizon was attempting to use NorthPoint as a bargaining chip during
its negotiations with CWA on behalf of Verizon Employees while they were
striking during the summer of 2000. Verizon was also attempting, as well,
in addition to many other reasons for "Wrongfully Terminating ", to
improve and increase its short-term stock price as Verizon stated in a
press release shortly after they terminated. Verizon’s stock price did
increase immediately.
Verizon felt that they agreed to pay too much for NorthPoint, seeing
the Technology sector as we know, across the board considerably lost its
value right around the time of the termination of the merger as well as
the Presidential recounts occurring simultaneously.
Verizon has expensive high speed internet services in place referred to
as T-1, T-2 etc… These services cost a considerable amount of money to the
consumers. Therefore, it seems evident that Verizon has caused one of the
largest DSL providers NorthPoint to be eliminated from the mix because now
Verizon can roll out DSL when and where they want to avoid "Cutting their
nose off to spite their face", meaning, NorthPoint will not be able to
offer (as Ms. Fetter, former President indicated), "Affordable Broadband"
to the public which can replace or be compatible with T-1 etc. Please read this well written article by Telecommunications
analyst concerning this matter and how the Baby Bells like Verizon have
"Intentionally" ruined the rollout of Broadband DSL High Speed Internet
Access to you and I.
It is clear that Verizon is attempting to the dominate the entire
Broadband DSL 500 Billion market share, as a recent expert analyst had
reported, and they appear to be using anti-trust and/or monopolization
methods of doing so. Please don’t let Verizon continue to finish the plan
of total domination as it appears very evident in nature based on the many
lawsuits, complaints from a considerably amount of competitors being
wrongfully damaged as we speak because of Verizon. Considerable Industry
data shows that virtually all similar companies offering Broadband DSL are
suffering because Verizon and other Baby Bells are not complying with the
1996 Telecommunications Act.
I have followed the NorthPoint and Verizon Merger and I have followed
NorthPoint since its initial IPO. Verizon is falsely claiming to have a
reason to terminate the merger. I believe that Verizon is playing everyone
as fools. There is a great deal of evidence that Verizon intended to
destroy NorthPoint and many companies partnered with them.
In a recent complaint filed with the FCC, Comptel.org, claimed that
they have been mistreated by Verizon in a variety of ways and that Verizon
has even violated it’s own merger agreement with GTE and Bell Atlantic.
Comptel contends that part of their merger agreement forming Verizon
required an independent auditor to be involved with these companies in
their future dealings with other companies like NorthPoint as well as
Comptel etc. The reason for this is to avoid exactly what has happened and
is sadly happening as we speak. Verizon is running Wild over each and
every company that it is indirectly or directly involved with. If there
had been such an auditor as required by their merger agreement maybe
NorthPoint wouldn’t be in this serious mess that Verizon has created
wrongfully and fraudulently.
Forgive me for my example, but Verizon seems to have been attempting to
kill not two birds with one stone, but in this case many birds, i.e..
companies relying on NorthPoint’s Network, with one stone to say the very
least. Even if we gave Verizon the benefit of the doubt claiming
NorthPoint restated its earnings NOT LIED ABOUT ITS EARNINGS, however,
restated its earnings, which was honest in my opinion. Then there was no
material adverse change in Northpoint. Flashcom, another DSL provider
which dealt directly with Verizon, was claiming bankruptcy. Therefore,
they couldn’t pay the monies they owed to NorthPoint. Flashcom was having
the same problems that other companies have had with Verizon concerning
the 1996 Telecommunications Act as well. NorthPoint restated its earnings
of about 6 Million dollars which is minute in comparison to the overall
value of NorthPoint of over 2 Billion dollars at the time and furthermore
due to the great demand of DSL by consumers as indicated, what is believed
to be a 500 Billion dollar market, which Verizon knew full well. Verizon
even funded one of the many reports concerning this that is circulating
around. Furthermore, either party, in this case, NorthPoint had until
08/07/2001 to cure any of the ALLEGED reasons why Verizon claimed they
terminated the legally binding merger. NorthPoint, by the way had already
made arrangements with Telocity and Microsoft MSN Internet to switch these
DSL lines that were in question resulting in a correction of any alleged
matters almost immediately.
Verizon gave NorthPoint NO advanced notice for canceling the promised
merger, which make us wonder as well, what the underlying reasons for
Verizon’s overt actions were. NorthPoint had many other Fortune Five
Hundred companies interested in their awesome large impressive DSL Network
and services they offered. If Verizon wouldn't have done what they have
done to NorthPoint, then NorthPoint would have partnered with a competitor
of Verizon like AT&T which eventually bought NorthPoint’s technology
equipment, sadly through bankruptcy proceedings. NorthPoint had
continually increased it DSL expansion since the date they agreed to merge
with Verizon. NorthPoint spent a lot of cash honesty and expecting the
reciprocation from Verizon to no avail as we know, Verizon reneged!
NorthPoint had rapidly expanded its DSL footprint and coverage throughout
the United States and Internationally from the time of the merger promise
08/08/2000. NorthPoint's overall expansion and partnerships continued to
increase more than ever before, yet Verizon cancelled because of some
concocted theory concerning their financial profile, or was its blatant
fraud as FLK claims on behalf of NorthPoint, we agree and many other
impartial and I am sure partial would agree and confirm if it didn't
negatively effect them in one form or another, bottom line, Verizon
appeared to have clearly violated the merger agreement with NorthPoint at
the very, very minimum.
This alleged Material Adverse Change in NorthPoint’s, Business model
was "nil to none", taking into consideration that NorthPoint was spending
cash "hand over fist" to please Verizon, knowing the merger was going to
go through shortly and Verizon was going to make its large payment due to
NorthPoint as agreed. Verizon as we know, knew exactly how much cash
NorthPoint had on hand and that NorthPoint was counting on Verizon’s
payment. Verizon never made the payment and they terminated the binding
merger agreement, why??? It is believed by many because Verizon wanted to
destroy a large competitor NorthPoint and its many partners so that
Verizon can gain all the market share in a Hot Commodity, DSL as we know
it.
The merger agreement also states, that "material adverse effect" is
very carefully defined in the Merger Agreement,
"... facts, events, changes and effects that are generally applicable
to (A) the data industry, (B) the United States economy or (C) the United
States securities markets generally or the NASDAQ Technology Index in
particular..."
ARE NOT MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS for purposes of interpreting the
Merger Agreement. This supports NorthPoint as well as the date 08/07/2001,
making it very difficult to terminate the merger agreement. The Merger
Agreement between Verizon and NorthPoint was signed on 8/8/2000. Before
and after Verizon terminated the Merger (including today), the data
industry, the United States economy, the U.S. securities markets and the
NASDAQ Technology Index have ALL had negative facts, events, similar
changes etc... It is also believed that, a third party like Flashcom,
cannot be the cause of either party to cancel the merger. Meaning, if
Flashcom’s financial matters created a problem, NorthPoint could not be
blamed for this, regardless, NorthPoint switched the majority if not "All"
the DSL lines to other Internet DSL Provider, mentioned of which are still
in business operating despite Verizon’s planned efforts to "Commit Fraud"
as FLK.com alleges as well as violating, time and time again, requirements
set forth by the 1996 Telecommunication Act Law that was created to "Cease
and Desist" this type of anti trust and monopolization’s from occurring.
This entire matter and future actions will affect everyone seeking
Broadband DSL at an " Affordable Cost", as well as in a timely fashion of
which Verizon has taken justice into its own hands and put an unnecessary
stop to DSL expansion by destroying NorthPoint and its partners. This is
not a business move, this is "Fraud" "Waste" and "Abuse" amongst other
unfavorable terms.
Besides, owning stock and being a long-term investor in NorthPoint,
"Not a Professional Investor" and communicating with many similar people
as myself and my family, former employees of NorthPoint, my heartfelt
prayers and thoughts are also with the consumers as well. Consumers as we
know it is you and I and everyone else. In some countries supposedly it is
a right to be offered Broadband DSL. This is a valuable tool in pursuing
an education, conducting research and development and ultimately the
expansion of technology as a whole. People are being denied these great
abilities and options because Verizon wants to dominate and destroy
competition.
Verizon should be stripped of the ammunition and weapons they use to
continually maim the people and industries that serve us and are us. Here
are just a few articles concerning how Verizon is basically destroying all
competition like NorthPoint and many others. This is a detailed report
including a list of DSL Competition (CLEC) that are regularly injured by
Verizon and the Baby Bells, please stop them!
SPECIAL
REPORT 1: "The Bells Caused The Current Financial Recession: The
Fiber-Optic Fiasco And America's Copper Dirt Road" A new, suggestive
analysis by New Networks Institute (NNI) lays out a series of related
events and actions on the part of the Bell Companies that have contributed
in a major way to the tech sector crash and will hamper the sector’s
recovery and the roll-out of broadband services. In its Special Report,
NNI claims that the Bell companies failure to roll out their broadband
services as promised along with their longstanding anticompetitive
behavior in the face of regulations and law obligating them to open up
their monopolies to competition has scared away investment and diminished
the growth prospects in the tech sector. These actions have contributed
substantially to the sector’s current problems and decline, as well as the
harm to the entire economy.
SPECIAL REPORT
2: "The Bells Harmed The CLEC Industry: Bell Funded Study By
Brooking’s Crandall On CLECs Is Flawed." This "Special Report" supplies
evidence that the Bell companies' anti-competitive behavior and lack of
enforcement has been the major impediment for competitors to offer local
phone and DSL/Broadband services, not the Competitive Local Exchange
Companies' (CLECs) business plans as some would suggest.
ABOUT the source of the above articles: New Networks
Institute, (NNI) was created to investigate, on a totally independent
impartial basis, how the break-up of AT&T and the the creation of Baby
Bells had impacted subscribers. Since that time we have completed the most
comprehensive research project ever undertaken, helped to initiate Class
Action suits in specific states, has filed comments and complaints with
the FCC, IRS, and other government agencies in the hopes of creating
change that benefit the telephone customer. In 2000, New Networks
Institute and associates proposed a new piece of Federal legislation ---
the "Broadband
Bill of Rights".
The companies effected are virtually all telecom, fiber-optic, servers,
routers, computers, chip makers, including Lucent, Nortel, JDSUniphase,
Corning, Intel, HP, Cisco, 3Com, and virtually all Competitive Local Phone
companies (CLECs) and ISPs, including Covad, Northpoint, Focal, McLeod,
Allegiance, Bwaynet, Panix, and PSINet. "The Bell companies have
successfully defended their aging copper wire phone networks and destroyed
any hope of competition or a fiber-optic future. Unless the problems of
telecommunications are fixed, the recession won't end anytime soon." · Did
America just spend $50 billion in higher phone charges for the same
75-year old copper network?
· Is ADSL over copper wiring the best it will ever be?
· Is America going to end up a third-rate technology nation?
A recent
report titled "An Assessment Of The Competitive Local Exchange
Carriers Five Years After The Passage Of The Telecommunications Act "
written by Robert Crandall, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institute and
funded by the USTA (United States Telephone Association, which represents
the Bell companies) concluded that the collapse of the CLEC market was
caused primarily by their own mistakes and not caused by the Bell
companies treatment of competitors. We believe Dr. Crandall’s conclusion
unwarranted and his analysis flawed by his decision to ignore an ample
body of evidence to the contrary.. These include:
- SBC pulled its long distance application in Missouri after the FCC
found that there were problems "related to cost-based pricing in its
region and operations support systems (OSS)"
- The Department of Justice stated that they could not endorse
Verizon's entrance into long distance in Pennsylvania because
"electronic billing problems have been extensive".
- FCC released Verizon-Massachusetts information in the "Provisioning
of POTS" (local phone service) found that Verizon's treatment of their
customers has remained fairly stable with 95% of all Bell orders handled
within five days. However, services supplied to CLECs have eroded from
85% in 9/97 to having only 25% being completed in a timely fashion in
6/00.
- The Communications Workers of America (CWA) released a report
claiming that Verizon-New York's own upper management was telling its
staffers to falsify data on installations, thus making it look to the
public that installations were all happening on time.
- The California ISP Association (CISPA) filed a formal complaint
charging Pac Bell and SBC with "anti-competitive conduct"
As you can see by visiting the reports and website links above Verizon
seems to have the "Intent, Capability, and Negligence" to intentionally
want to destroy all of its competition of which would be beneficial to all
of the world seeking other affordable alternatives. Please see this
article as well, which is another clearly depiction of how the Baby Bells
and Verizon specifically is severely negatively impacting dedicated
companies looking to assist customers world wide in obtaining Broadband
DSL. Please visit this article and view yet another detailed complaint
submitted by another, what appears to be yet another innocent injured CLEC
Broadband DSL provider and association.
Consider this
press release dated 8/6/01
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Competitive Telecommunications Association
(CompTel) today urged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to
impose forfeitures on Verizon Communications, Inc. for failing to comply
with the Commission's Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Order and Conditions. Under
the terms of the Merger Order, Verizon is required to retain an
independent auditor to evaluate Verizon's compliance with the Merger
Conditions. Two recent audits revealed significant instances of
noncompliance with the Merger Conditions, resulting in harm to competitive
telecommunications carriers.
CompTel, while calling attention to numerous instances of
noncompliance, requested an expedited investigation into those areas that
were particularly devastating to competitors seeking to deliver advanced
services to consumers. CompTel noted specifically that an audit of
Verizon's separate advanced services affiliate revealed that Verizon
failed to invoice the affiliate for line-sharing during the period July
2000 through April 2001, and provided the affiliate access to operations
support systems (OSS) that were not made available to other
telecommunications carriers.
"These audits clearly demonstrate that Verizon is discriminating to the
advantage of its advanced services affiliate, which constitutes a
violation of the Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Conditions," said H. Russell
Frisby, Jr., president of CompTel. "Enforcement, with strong penalties,
will send the message that no violation will be tolerated, providing
competitors 'an increased measure of confidence that the company will not
engage in discrimination,' as envisioned by the Merger Order."
The audit reports also found that:
Verizon did not provide competing carriers timely and accurate bill
credits for unbundled network elements and resold telecommunications
services, effectively resulting in a no-interest loan to Verizon; and
Verizon consistently miscalculated performance measures, failed to
report performance measures, failed to capture the underlying data needed
to calculate performance measures, or unilaterally revised the business
rules associated with certain performance measures, making it impossible
for regulators and competitive carriers to detect discrimination by
Verizon.
CompTel urged the Commission to impose appropriate sanctions for any
violations uncovered by the audit reports to deter future violations, and
called for a full investigation into all potential instances of
noncompliance with the Merger Order and Conditions and underlying FCC
rules.
End of articles, continuation of letter:
Verizon should be required, rightfully so to pay the $4 Billion as of
this date, and more in interest and punitive damages as time goes on.
We were promised by NorthPoint Investor Relations, Mr. Terry McGovern
that the only way of NorthPoint NPNTQ Shareholders can collect on their
investments is if there is a big enough settlement or jury verdict to
cover the debt. Please don’t allow this matter to settle for anything less
than what the amended complaint on 07/12/2001 describes- $4 Billion
Dollars or more plus the other requirements ie;, proceed with original
merger etc. We prefer a verdict by jury trial as FLK and the lawsuit
contends will occur to allow the truth and justice to be captured
correctly. Many shareholders we communicate with regularly both
internationally and from America agree in full that Verizon has done very
wrong and should be brought to justice and held fully accountable for
their disgraceful actions they have taken.
In this letter I have covered a variety of unfair acts on the part of
Verizon and there are many more legitimate complaints as circulating
around of which legally support similar claims as made by NorthPoint.
However, we completely agree with Folger, Levin and Kahn (FLK) lawsuit
submitted on behalf of NorthPoint as well as amended complaint’s filed on
07/12/2001 submitted by the US Trustees Office in support of NorthPoint
and all people directly and indirectly extremely effected by Verizon’s
apparent unfair acts. It seems rather clear that Verizon's Executives have
intentionally cancelled a contractual legal obligation, merger agreement
to ruin NorthPoint. Verizon promised NorthPoint and we NorthPoint
shareholders that they would merge with NorthPoint forming the "Nations
Largest DSL Provider" and we feel strongly that Verizon failed us all.
Many of us purchased stock in NorthPoint knowing and trusting that this
would be a reasonably secure investment, seeing that Verizon had promised
to merge with NorthPoint and in turn provide us with a "New NorthPoint
Share", $2.50 for each share we owned and 45% in the newly formed company
in addition to other promises.
Please contact me should
you require any information whatsoever from my private group of which has
a great deal of information concerning Verizon’s overt actions. This
matter at hand is not only about honest, hard working individuals (many of
whom I communicate with) losing " hard earned money", this matter at hand
goes much deeper than that. This matter at hand is about 'Honesty",
"Trust" and Verizon's legal obligations to merge with NorthPoint as
legally agreed to by both parties. This matter at hand is about this
merger agreement benefiting the 'Entire World Seeking Broadband DSL" of
which have all been denied the "fair opportunity to experience Broadband
DSL High Speed Internet Access of which would broaden each and everyone’s
horizons and life style to say the very least. The Verizon Customer DSL
"Class Action Lawsuit" is clear proof that Verizon has hurt more people
besides all that are directly related to NorthPoint, Verizon has hurt the
"Entire Consumer Population" but not limited to, the list goes on and on
and on! Please see the many other articles in print and via the internet
concerning Verizon’s continued disrespect and unfair business practices.
We would be honored to assist you in seeking the truth and "Fair and
Equitable" relief for all that have been so negatively affected by
Verizon. Please assist us and the world in seeing that "Justice Prevails"
concerning Verizon and the massive problems that they have apparently
caused.
PS: This is not spam, we are seeking your organizations support to
assist in seeking that “Justice Prevails” against Verizon and for You, I,
and the entire world. If you do not wish to receive this message please
reply email us with your exact email addresses you want removed so that we
can do this for you. Thank You!
The views and theories on this website are of the opinion of certain
people. It is up to you or whomever to do your own further research
concerning this matter and make your own final judgements.
http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/6814.html http://www.broadbandweek.com/news/010205/010205_news_class.htm http://www.newnetworks.com/pressclecharm.htm http://www.newnetworks.com/prispsurvey2001.htm http://www.newnetworks.com/fiberopitcfiasco.htm http://news.com.com/2100-1033-251549.html?legacy=cnet http://www.bellatlanticpathetic.com/lawsuits.html http://www.bellatlanticpathetic.com/articles.html http://www.bellatlanticpathetic.com/sitelinks.html http://www.verizoneatspoop.com/news.html http://www.ihatethephonecompany.com/news.html http://albany.bizjournals.com/albany/stories/2001/09/17/daily14.html http://www.washtech.com/news/regulation/13521-1.html http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/011214/dcf002_1.html http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2001/116095_01-29-2001.html Verizon competitors petition for breakup of divisions http://dc.internet.com/news/article/0,1934,2101_920561,00.html http://www.thedigest.com/more/134/134-011.html http://www.broadbandweek.com/news/010219/print/010219_news_ground.htm http://www.consumeraffairs.com/cell_phones/bell_atlantic_mobile.htm http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D701%2526a%253D7042,00.asp http://www.internetnews.com/isp-news/article/0,,8_451441,00.html http://www.localcompetition.org/7010/ http://bellatlanticpathetic.com/bb.html http://www.newnetworks.com/reports.html http://www.thedigest.com/more/124/124-116.html http://www.phoneplusmag.com/articles/0c1rnew4.html http://www.cmht.com/casewatch/cases/cwverizon2.htm
http://www.dslprime.com/a/wrongfiled_complaint.pdf
|